Initial condition
Record the wider accessible condition within the agreed first-inspection scope while utilities and important surfaces are available.
Use each checkpoint to answer the decision in front of you, not to repeat the same visit five times.
A useful DLP timeline connects the initial condition, submitted concerns, rectification evidence and later checkpoints. The right timing depends on your documents, current stage, access and the decision you need to make.
The sequence preserves continuity without suggesting that every visit is a full inspection or that one schedule suits every property.
Record the wider accessible condition within the agreed first-inspection scope while utilities and important surfaces are available.
Organise findings by location and evidence, then retain acknowledgements, appointments and responses from the applicable channel.
Compare agreed items with the usable baseline after rectification is said to be complete and the relevant areas are accessible.
Review current concerns or meaningful changes while there is still time to plan the next action within the owner's confirmed timeline.
Complete the final agreed current-condition check before the deadline the owner has independently confirmed.
Keep each later observation connected to the original item, method, result, limitation and responsible next step.
Read the property documents and developer process. Obtain appropriate advice when a deadline or right is uncertain.
Inspect before renovation, move-in or repair activity changes important evidence.
Keep submissions, repair updates and verification evidence connected to the same identifiable items.
Use a later checkpoint to understand the current condition and unresolved actions before the confirmed deadline.
Records worth keeping across the DLP journey
See a property-matched price first. Contact details are requested only after you choose an option.
Get Instant QuoteNo. The useful number and scope depend on the property, selected package, earlier evidence and decisions that arise during the DLP journey.
No. Later checkpoints may be focused on repairs, agreed concerns or a defined current-condition review. DPM confirms the intended scope and record first.
No. Confirm the applicable date from your SPA, developer documents and appropriate professional advice.
Keep the repair status and access limitation visible. A verification visit is most useful when the relevant work is said to be complete and can be accessed.
Possibly, but DPM must first review the available baseline and current purpose. A later comparison cannot recreate evidence that was never recorded.
No phone number is needed to view the available price.
Get My Instant Quote